A modular hierarchy of logical frameworks

نویسنده

  • Robin Adams
چکیده

We present a method for defining logical frameworks as a collection of features which are defined and behave independently of one another. Each feature is a set of grammar clauses and rules of deduction such that the result of adding the feature to a framework is a conservative extension of the framework itself. We show how several existing logical frameworks can be so built, and how several much weaker frameworks defined in this manner are adequate for expressing a wide variety of object logics.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Logical frameworks for specifying and reasoning about stateful and concurrent languages∗

Substructural logics, such as linear logic and ordered logic, have an inherent notion of state and state change. This makes them a natural choice for developing logical frameworks that specify evolving stateful systems. Our previous work has shown that the so-called forward reasoning fragment of ordered linear logic can be used to give clear, concise, and modular specifications of stateful and ...

متن کامل

Generalized Quantifiers in Logic Programs

Generalized quantiiers are an important concept in model-theoretic logic which has applications in diierent elds such as linguistics , philosophical logic and computer science. In this paper, we consider a novel application in the eld of logic programming, which has been presented recently. The enhancement of logic programs by generalized quantiiers is a convenient tool for interfacing extra-lo...

متن کامل

Reasoning in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas1

Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) constitute a recent and powerful generalization of Dung’s argumentation frameworks (AFs), where the relationship between the arguments is specified via Boolean formulas. Recent results have shown that this enhancement comes with the price of higher complexity compared to AFs. In fact, acceptance problems in the world of ADFs can be hard even for the third ...

متن کامل

Reasoning in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas

dialectical frameworks (ADFs) constitute a recent and powerful generalisation of Dung’s argumentation frameworks (AFs), where the relationship between the arguments can be specified via Boolean formulas. Recent results have shown that this enhancement comes with the price of higher complexity compared to AFs. In fact, acceptance problems in the world of ADFs can be hard even for the third level...

متن کامل

Intuitive and logical way of thinking in the education of architectural design courses

Different approaches and methods are used in the architecture design process that logical and intuitional methods are the most common ones. The role of knowledge in each method is different.  Investigating aspects of knowledge demonstrated the hierarchy from data to wisdom and the interaction of explicit and tacit types, subjective and objective sources, and analytical and exploratory ways of p...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003